1945 Jeep CJ2 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jeep CJ2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jeep CJ2 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (503 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 444 more horse power than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1945 Jeep CJ2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 765 kg more than 1945 Jeep CJ2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (625 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 479 more torque (in Nm) than 1945 Jeep CJ2. (146 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1945 Jeep CJ2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Jeep CJ2 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Jeep | Jaguar |
| Model | CJ2 | XF |
| Year Released | 1945 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 503 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 625 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2909 mm |
