1945 Jeep MB vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jeep MB would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1945 Jeep MB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 2 (81 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1945 Jeep MB. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1945 Jeep MB.
Because 1945 Jeep MB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1945 Jeep MB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1945 Jeep MB (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (141 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1945 Jeep MB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Jeep MB | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | MB | 2 |
| Year Released | 1945 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 141 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3330 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2500 mm |
