1945 Jeep MB vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jeep MB would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1945 Jeep MB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1945 Jeep MB. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1945 Jeep MB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura CSX weights approximately 233 kg more than 1945 Jeep MB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1945 Jeep MB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1945 Jeep MB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Jeep MB | 2010 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Jeep | Acura |
| Model | MB | CSX |
| Year Released | 1945 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3330 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |
