1945 Jeep MB vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Jeep MB would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1945 Jeep MB. (59 HP @ 3820 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1945 Jeep MB.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1945 Jeep MB. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1945 Jeep MB.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Jeep MB | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | MB | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1945 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 3820 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 180 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3010 mm |