1945 Riley RM A vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,523 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo S40 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1945 Riley RM A.
Because 1945 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 1945 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1945 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1945 Riley RM A | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Riley | Volvo |
| Model | RM A | S40 |
| Year Released | 1945 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 216 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1425 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2670 mm |
