1945 Riley RM A vs. 2009 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2009 Subaru Outback is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Subaru Outback weights approximately 403 kg more than 1945 Riley RM A.
Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1945 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 1945 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1945 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Riley RM A | 2009 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Riley | Subaru |
Model | RM A | Outback |
Year Released | 1945 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1638 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2680 mm |