1945 Simca 5 vs. 2000 Volvo S40
To start off, 2000 Volvo S40 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Simca 5 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S40 (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1945 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1945 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S40 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1945 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1945 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1945 Simca 5 | 2000 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Simca | Volvo |
Model | 5 | S40 |
Year Released | 1945 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 568 cc | 1946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 14 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3220 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1280 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2650 mm |