1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1951 Austin A 40
To start off, 1951 Austin A 40 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 530 kg more than 1951 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1951 Austin A 40 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
| Model | 6C | A 40 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 48 L |
