1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1953 Allard K3
To start off, 1953 Allard K3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,373 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1953 Allard K3 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Allard |
Model | 6C | K3 |
Year Released | 1946 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4373 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2550 mm |