1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,247 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Studebaker |
Model | 6C | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1946 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2980 mm |