1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1982 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 200 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
| Model | 6C | Le Baron |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2560 mm |
