1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1983 Jaguar XJS

To start off, 1983 Jaguar XJS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,590 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Jaguar XJS (226 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 260 kg more than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1946 Alfa Romeo 6C 1983 Jaguar XJS
Make Alfa Romeo Jaguar
Model 6C XJS
Year Released 1946 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2443 cc 3590 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 105 HP 226 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 72 mm 91 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 92 mm
Top Speed 165 km/hour 229 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1400 kg 1660 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1270 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2600 mm