1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1987 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1987 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Ford Thunderbird (193 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 564 kg more than 1987 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1987 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1946 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 116 L |