1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1989 Chrysler Conquest
To start off, 1989 Chrysler Conquest is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler Conquest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chrysler Conquest (186 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Conquest should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 75 kg more than 1989 Chrysler Conquest.
Because 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Conquest, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1989 Chrysler Conquest | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
Model | 6C | Conquest |
Year Released | 1946 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 186 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2450 mm |