1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1998 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 1998 Fiat Bravo is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Fiat Bravo (152 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 310 kg more than 1998 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1998 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Fiat |
Model | 6C | Bravo |
Year Released | 1946 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1908 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 152 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 60 L |