1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1999 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1999 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | Tracker |
Year Released | 1946 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2210 mm |