1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2000 Toyota GT1
To start off, 2000 Toyota GT1 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2000 Toyota GT1. (85 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota GT1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 500 kg more than 2000 Toyota GT1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2000 Toyota GT1 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
| Model | 6C | GT1 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 93.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 72.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 225 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1130 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2810 mm |
