1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Chevrolet S-10
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet S-10 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet S-10 (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet S-10 should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 30 kg more than 2003 Chevrolet S-10.
Because 2003 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2003 Chevrolet S-10 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | S-10 |
Year Released | 1946 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3130 mm |