1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 364 kg more than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
Model | 6C | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1946 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 87 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 78 L |