1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 13 kg more than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercury |
| Model | 6C | Sable |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 155 HP |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1513 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 68 L |
