1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 804 kg more than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 6C | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2304 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 132 L |
