1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2005 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (301 HP) has 212 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 961 kg more than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 Land Rover LR3 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Land Rover |
Model | 6C | LR3 |
Year Released | 1946 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 301 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2461 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 86 L |