1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 MG TF
To start off, 2005 MG TF is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MG TF (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 200 kg more than 2005 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 MG TF | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | MG |
Model | 6C | TF |
Year Released | 1946 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 89.3 mm |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 50 L |