1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saab 9000 (165 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000 should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Saab |
Model | 6C | 9000 |
Year Released | 1946 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2290 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1665 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 61 L |