1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 150 kg more than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
Model | 6C | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1946 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 98.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 86.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 174 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 72 L |