1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | Captiva |
Year Released | 1946 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 165 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 65 L |