1946 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ecosport (118 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1946 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |