1946 Allard J1 vs. 1954 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1954 Studebaker Commander is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Allard J1 would be higher. At 3,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Studebaker Commander (140 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1946 Allard J1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Studebaker Commander should accelerate faster than 1946 Allard J1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 400 kg more than 1946 Allard J1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Allard J1 | 1954 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Allard | Studebaker |
Model | J1 | Commander |
Year Released | 1946 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3673 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 7.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 132 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3070 mm |