1946 Allard J1 vs. 2000 BMW 328
To start off, 2000 BMW 328 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Allard J1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Allard J1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 328 (201 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1946 Allard J1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1946 Allard J1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 328 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1946 Allard J1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 328 (279 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1946 Allard J1. (203 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1946 Allard J1.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Allard J1 | 2000 BMW 328 | |
Make | Allard | BMW |
Model | J1 | 328 |
Year Released | 1946 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2977 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 279 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2730 mm |