1946 Allard J1 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Allard J1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Allard J1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1946 Allard J1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1946 Allard J1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1946 Allard J1 (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1946 Allard J1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Allard J1 | 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | J1 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1946 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2210 mm |