1946 Allard J1 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Allard J1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Allard J1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (94 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1946 Allard J1. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1946 Allard J1.
Because 1946 Allard J1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Allard J1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Allard J1 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | J1 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1946 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2490 mm |