1946 Allard J1 vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Allard J1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Allard J1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1946 Allard J1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1946 Allard J1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 366 kg more than 1946 Allard J1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1946 Allard J1 (203 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (183 Nm). This means 1946 Allard J1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Allard J1 | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | J1 | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2630 mm |
