1946 Allard K1 vs. 1998 Lotus Emme
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1946 Allard K1. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1946 Allard K1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Allard K1 weights approximately 389 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1946 Allard K1. (204 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1946 Allard K1.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Allard K1 | 1998 Lotus Emme | |
Make | Allard | Lotus |
Model | K1 | Emme |
Year Released | 1946 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 260 HP |
Torque | 204 Nm | 354 Nm |
Top Speed | 138 km/hour | 275 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 678 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2770 mm |