1946 Allard K1 vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1946 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1946 Allard K1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 439 kg more than 1946 Allard K1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1946 Allard K1. (204 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1946 Allard K1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Allard K1 | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | K1 | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 266 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 1506 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 62 L |
