1946 Allard K1 vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1946 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1946 Allard K1.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Allard K1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1946 Allard K1. (204 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1946 Allard K1.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Allard K1 | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Allard | Mazda |
Model | K1 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1946 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 102 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |