1946 Alvis TA 14 vs. 2009 Ford E-250
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alvis TA 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alvis TA 14 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1946 Alvis TA 14. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1946 Alvis TA 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Alvis TA 14 weights approximately 456 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 1946 Alvis TA 14 has manual transmission. 1946 Alvis TA 14 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alvis TA 14 | 2009 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Alvis | Ford |
Model | TA 14 | E-250 |
Year Released | 1946 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 6030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3510 mm |