1946 Alvis TA 14 vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Alvis TA 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Alvis TA 14 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1946 Alvis TA 14. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1946 Alvis TA 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 334 kg more than 1946 Alvis TA 14. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Alvis TA 14 | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Alvis | Cadillac |
Model | TA 14 | CTS |
Year Released | 1946 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1842 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2880 mm |