1946 Austin 16 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1960 Toyota Master RR is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Austin 16 (63 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1946 Austin 16 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Austin 16 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Austin 16 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | 16 | Master RR |
Year Released | 1946 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |