1946 Austin 16 vs. 1962 Maserati Tipo 64
To start off, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1946 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 1946 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Austin 16 weights approximately 640 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Austin 16 | 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | |
| Make | Austin | Maserati |
| Model | 16 | Tipo 64 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2210 mm |
