1946 Austin 16 vs. 1985 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1985 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Fiat Ritmo (81 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1946 Austin 16. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1946 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Austin 16 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1985 Fiat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1946 Austin 16 (146 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1946 Austin 16 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Austin 16 | 1985 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | 16 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1946 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 71.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 57 L |