1946 Austin 16 vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1986 Ford Ranger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1946 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1946 Austin 16.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Austin 16. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Austin 16 | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 16 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1946 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |