1946 Austin 16 vs. 2011 Holden Calais
To start off, 2011 Holden Calais is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Austin 16 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 215 more horse power than 1946 Austin 16. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1946 Austin 16.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1946 Austin 16. (146 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1946 Austin 16. 2011 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1946 Austin 16 has manual transmission. 1946 Austin 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Austin 16 | 2011 Holden Calais | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | 16 | Calais |
Year Released | 1946 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |