1946 Austin 16 vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1946 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1946 Austin 16.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Austin 16. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1946 Austin 16. (146 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1946 Austin 16.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Austin 16 | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 16 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1946 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3010 mm |