1946 Bristol 450 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1963 Cadillac 62 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1946 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1946 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1360 kg more than 1946 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Bristol 450 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 450 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 79 L |
