1946 Bristol 450 vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 1963 Lotus Elite is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1946 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Bristol 450 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Bristol 450 | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Bristol | Lotus |
Model | 450 | Elite |
Year Released | 1946 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 29 L |