1946 Bristol 450 vs. 1982 Zastava 132
To start off, 1982 Zastava 132 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1946 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Zastava 132 weights approximately 368 kg more than 1946 Bristol 450.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Bristol 450 | 1982 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Bristol | Zastava |
Model | 450 | 132 |
Year Released | 1946 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1098 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2560 mm |