1946 Bristol 450 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (191 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1946 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1946 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 860 kg more than 1946 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Bristol 450 | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
| Model | 450 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 191 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2570 mm |
