1946 Bristol 450 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1946 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1946 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 890 kg more than 1946 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1946 Bristol 450 2003 Cadillac CTS
Make Bristol Cadillac
Model 450 CTS
Year Released 1946 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1971 cc 2597 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 153 HP 179 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 66 mm 83.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 96 mm 79.6 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 730 kg 1620 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 64 L