1946 Bristol 450 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1946 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1946 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 908 kg more than 1946 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Bristol 450 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 450 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 304 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1638 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |
