1946 Bristol 450 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1946 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1946 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1026 kg more than 1946 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Bristol 450 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 450 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |
